RSM Archives - scmGalaxy https://www.scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/tag/rsm/ A Platform for Software Engineers Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:15:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 Compare between RSM and Sonar https://www.scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/compare-between-rsm-and-sonar/ https://www.scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/compare-between-rsm-and-sonar/#respond Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:54:24 +0000 http://www.scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/?p=4503 Metrics Tools Category Metric Comment RSM Sonar Function Metrics LOC Lines of Code Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes eLOC […]

The post Compare between RSM and Sonar appeared first on scmGalaxy.

]]> Metrics Tools Category Metric Comment RSM Sonar Function Metrics LOC Lines of Code Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes eLOC (Effective LOC) Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Per Function, All Functions Yes No FP Function Points Derived from LOC metrics Per Function, All Functions Yes No Comments Lines Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes Blank Lines Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes Physical Lines Per Function, All Functions Yes Yes Number of Input Parameters Per Function, Yes No Number of Return Points Per Function, Yes No Interface Complexity (Parameters + Returns) Per Function, Yes Yes Cyclomatic Complexity Logical Branching Per Function, All Functions Yes No Functional Complexity (Interface + Cyclomatic) Per Function, All Functions Yes No Functional Quality Analysis Per Function, Yes Yes Number of functions Total, Average, Maximum and Minimums All Functions Yes Yes Logical Lines All Functions Yes No Return Points All Functions Yes No Function Parameters All Functions Yes No Total Quality Profile All Functions Yes ? Class Metrics Number of public, private, protected data attributes Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes Number of public, private, protected methods Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes Template Type Per Class, Yes No Inheritance Per Class, Yes No Depth of Inheritance Tree Per Class, Yes Yes Number of derived child classes per base class Per Class, Yes Yes LOC Lines of Code Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes eLOC (Effective LOC) Per Class, All Classes Yes No lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Per Class, All Classes Yes No Comments Lines Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes Blank Lines Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes Physical Lines Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes Number of Input Parameters Per Class, All Classes Yes No Number of Return Points Per Class, All Classes Yes No Interface Complexity (Parameters + Returns) Per Class, All Classes Yes No Cyclomatic Complexity Logical Branching Per Class, All Classes Yes No Class Complexity (Interface + Cyclomatic) Per Class, All Classes Yes Yes Class Quality Analysis RSM Quality Analysis Per Class, Yes No Total number of classes All Classes Yes Yes Inheritance Tree All Classes Yes No Number of Base Classes All Classes Yes Yes Number of Derived Classes All Classes Yes Yes Derived/Base Class Ratio All Classes Yes No Maximum and Average Inheritance Depth All Classes Yes No Maximum and Average Number of Child Classes All Classes Yes No Total Quality Profile All Classes Yes ? Namespace or Package Metrics Number of classes Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes Number of functions Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes Average functions per class Per Namespace, Yes Yes Number of public, private, protected data attributes Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes Number of public, private, protected methods Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes LOC Lines of Code Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes eLOC (Effective LOC) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No Comments Lines Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes Blank Lines Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes Physical Lines Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes Yes Number of Input Parameters Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No Number of Return Points Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No Interface Complexity (Parameters + Returns) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No Cyclomatic Complexity Logical Branching Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No Package/Namespace Complexity (Interface + Cyclomatic) Per Namespace, All Namespace/Packages Yes No Quality Analysis RSM Quality Analysis Per Namespace, Yes No Total Quality Profile All Namespace/Packages Yes ? File Metrics LOC Lines of Code Yes Yes eLOC (Effective LOC) Yes No lLOC (Logical Statements LOC) Yes No FP Function Points Derived from LOC Yes No Comments Lines Yes Yes Blank Lines Yes Yes Logical and Physical Lines Yes Yes Comment and White space percentages Yes Yes Average Character line length Yes No Memory Allocation and De-allocation metric Yes No Language Keyword use Yes No Language Construct use Yes No Extract Comments per file for understandability rating and spell checking Yes No Extract Strings per file for spell checking Yes No Create files in line numbered format for code reviews Yes No Number of Quality Notices per file Yes No Metrics differentials between two file version Yes No Project Metrics Total LOC, eLOC, lLOC, Comment, Blanks, Lines Yes Yes FP Function Points Derived from LOC metrics Yes No Total Function Metrics Yes No Total Class Metrics Yes Yes Total Namespace Metrics Yes No Inheritance Tree and Metrics Yes No Language Keywords, constructs and metrics Yes No Quality Profile Yes ? Metric Estimation Factors for software estimates Yes No Total Language Metrics Example Yes No Total C, C++ and Header Files Yes No Total Java Files Yes No Total Number of Files Yes Yes Baseline Metric Differential Yes Yes

The post Compare between RSM and Sonar appeared first on scmGalaxy.

]]> https://www.scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/compare-between-rsm-and-sonar/feed/ 0